Neue Artikel

Archiv

Aktuelles

Einladung zum 10. Uni Talk: Die Generalsekretärin von amnesty international, Frau Dr. Monika Lüke, spricht zum Thema "Niemand steht über dem Gesetz! - Warum Menschenrechtsverletzungen nicht straflos bleiben dürfen..." MORGEN (Mittwoch, 14.07.2010) um 12:45 Uhr in der Uni Düsseldorf. mehr...

Berlin reste le partenaire privilégié du Kremlin: DIAS Senior Fellow zu den deutsch-russischen Beziehungen in "La Tribune" vom 02.03.2010. mehr ...

Merkel porte la voix de l’Europe au Congrès des États-Unis: DIAS-Vorsitzender zu Merkels USA-Besuch in "La Tribune" vom 4.11.2009.

mehr ...

DIAS-Analyse Nr. 43 online. Vinzenz Himmighofen zu
United Nations Mission to Afghanistan – Zwischen humanitären Prinzipien und der Erfüllung des Auftrags

mehr ...

"Western Nations must get China on board on Iran issue": DIAS-Vorstandsvorsitzender Dr. Dimitrios Argirakos im Deutsche Welle-Interview.

mehr ...

"Nationale Sicherheit hat für die USA Priorität": DIAS-Vorstand Dr. Burkhard Theile im Gespräch mit der WIK.

mehr ...

"Im Alltag die Werte leben": Das Personalmagazin im Gespräch mit DIAS-Vorstand John N. Kayser über Führungskräfteentwicklung bei der Commerzbank.

mehr ...

Der 5. Uni Talk im Fernsehen: center.tv hat einen Bericht über den Vortrag von Guantánamo-Anwältin Pardiss Kebriaei an der Heinrich-Heine-Universität gesendet.

mehr …

Aufsatzwettbewerb zum 60-jährigen Bestehen der NATO: Das DIAS richtet in Kooperation mit der NATO Public Diplomacy Division einen bundesweiten Aufsatzwettbewerb zum Thema "60 Jahre NATO - Das Bündnis Gestern, Heute und Morgen" aus.

mehr …

 

 

Mitglied werden

Zum Antragsformular

Schnellsuche

DIAS-Testimonials

"In einer globalisierten Welt brauchen wir die realistische, glaubwürdige und furchtlose Expertise."

Sven Gösmann
(Chefredakteur Rheinische Post)

DIAS Schriftenreihe

DIAS Schriftenreihe: Völkerrechtliche Stellung von internationalen Terrororganisationen

Dr. Lars Mammen
Völkerrechtliche Stellung von internationalen Terrororganisationen
2007, 342 S., ISBN 978-3-8329-2778-3
(Düsseldorfer Schriften zu Internationaler Politik und Völkerrecht, Bd. 4)

mehr

Erstellt am: 09.07.2008 Autor: Philipp Schweers Status: Senior

A new security paradigm for the Persian Gulf

The combination of economic strength, new partners and pressing security challenges could open the door for a new transregional partnership in the Persian Gulf which can in turn answer the strategic challenges of a new century.

The changing security environment in the region requires a different and more emancipated regional security approach, at the center of which is intensified cooperation between the region's rising powers Iran and Saudi Arabia. While existing contradicting political and religious extremes hinder such transregional cooperation, new economic and political opportunities and new partnerships may help to overcome the polarization.

The Gulf enjoys economic prosperity and importance on the international scene. Its oil resources provide the region with a competitive advantage in the international community. However, the entire area suffers from the negative impact of the foreign occupation in Iraq.

Transregional opportunities and challenges call for a new paradigm in Persian Gulf security, one based on transregional cooperation. The Gulf has to resolve existing intra-regional antagonism and convert its oil power into durable and independent growth. Intra-regional rivalry and competition is weakening the global position of the Gulf region.

Hegemonial rivalry

The constant rise of the oil price and regional economic strength could lay the foundation for political and economic consolidation of the Gulf region. Exploding gross domestic product in many states results in growing financial influence and independence of these actors. At the same time, the region is challenged by two major problems: increasing rivalry between Iran and its neighbors on the other side of the Gulf, especially Saudi Arabia, and the weak security situation in the region due to the conflict in Iraq.

The solving of these two crucial conflicts requires a synthesis of partly contradicting extremes - both sides, Iran and Saudi Arabia, claim regional leadership - emerging out of their shortsighted and self-interested strategies. Instead of working together, these actors try to contain each other.

Increasing sectarian strife in Iraq and the inability to reach a consensus between Iran and Saudi Arabia have characterized the Gulf during the past years. These negative experiences and developments need to be converted into a new and constructive paradigm of transregional cooperation and partnership.

In cooperation with the smaller states, the great powers of the region, namely Iran and Saudi Arabia, could solve strategic challenges like repacifying Iraq and, at the same time, cartelize the region's economic power. Regional competition for hegemony negatively impacts the strategic and economic development of the Gulf region.

Security dialogue

With the exception of the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC), there is little security dialogue among the Persian Gulf states. Even in the GCC itself, with its members Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, security structures are weak. For example, the planned joint defence force Dira' al-Jazeera ("Peninsula Shield") remains a two brigade-strong force with only a small non-Saudi contingent.

The desire to establish a strong and independent regional security structure within the GCC has barely been addressed. The smaller states fear the dominance of Saudi Arabia and the growing influence of Iran. An essential consensus, let alone a unique regional position, is still inexistent.

But challenges like the situation in Iraq or the increasing tensions between Shiite and Sunni Muslim groups in other parts of the region like Bahrain, Yemen or Saudi Arabia demand strong regional security cooperation. In this context it is highly important to engage instead of contain Iran.

For the future, it is a key priority for the Persian Gulf littoral states to establish a transregional and coherent security structure together with Iran. Such a new security paradigm, together with the economic strength of the region, would shore up the region's standing and stability.

The combination of a unique position and a coherent strategy on security issues would calm the intra-regional rivalry and allow sufficient articulation of transregional interests. An essential security dialogue within the region could ward off an arms race.

New partners

The area can increasingly count on new partners due to changes in the international power structure. Growing multipolarism within the international environment opens the door for new alliances, more independence and essential dialogue at eye level.

The European Union (EU) for example, a rising power in the global resource competition, is highly interested in sustainable stability combined with good governance and free development in the region. Together with its geographical vicinity, the EU has the potential to be a major partner of the Gulf region, especially in the security and economic field. At the same time, the EU's intergovernmental system could serve as a prototype for the Gulf region.

China, India and Russia also offer new political and economic opportunities for the Gulf region. These countries are of growing importance globally in political and economic terms and do not have an imperialistic background in the Gulf. They are mainly interested in trade and strategic partnerships at eye level with less ambition toward regional domination.

Due to the region's economic strength, the Gulf countries can be considered reasonable partners or allies for their regional neighbors. Prosperity enhances the independence of the region. Full-fledged cooperation in times of economic growth and industrial diversification could boost the region's global position as well as its stability.

Individual or bilateral partnerships with external actors like between Saudi Arabia and the US or France and some smaller states in the region are not enough. The reasons for these partnerships are marked by insufficient regional containment strategies (for example Saudi Arabia – US vs Iran – Russia). To avoid an intra-regional struggle for power, a coherent intra-regional strategy toward external partners is needed.

A chance for transregional convergence

While the resources of the Gulf region are key to regional stability and independence, optimal growth and profit can only be reached by concentrating on the area's potential for strong transregional cooperation. Short-sighted conflicting strategies in intra-regional economic issues only result in losing the absolute advantage. Thus, a transregional and coherent approach to economic questions is overdue.

The division of the Gulf region into several individual and mostly competing economic and political actors not only weakens the region's potential. With the changing international security environment, the region's current and future security is also endangered.

Deepening convergence in economic terms would strengthen the region's position in times of growing global competition and be invigorating for its political stability and future.

Philipp Schweers
Research Fellow, Düsseldorf Institute for Foreign and Security Policy (DIAS)

This article was published in ISN´s Special Issue July 2008 - Newsletter

Copyright 2008 ISN/ETH Zurich